Asrock Z270 Killer SLI/ac

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics53.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z270 Killer SLI/ac  (all builds)
Memory8.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170510
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 12 '20 at 03:55
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 104
2-Core 205
75% 131 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 390
52% 391 Pts
64-Core 391
24% 391 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E366) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.8.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Lighting 67.1
Reflection 66.9
Parallax 83.2
55% 72.4 fps
MRender 66.7
Gravity 64.3
Splatting 55.4
50% 62.1 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SB8U-128G-1006 128GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4120006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 39 41 41 41 42 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 48% Great: 91%
Seagate ST1000DM003 160GB
106GB free
Firmware: 3.CHH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 67 67 68 68 68 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 69.4
Write 40.7
Mixed 41.3
SusWrite 67.1
40% 54.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5143EB1-CPB Kingston HP24D4U7S8MBP-8 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.2% Average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 10.8
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 11.7
36% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 Killer SLI/ac Builds (Compare 1,077 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asrock Z270 Killer SLI/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $638
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback