Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics81.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive207% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA  (all builds)
Memory60 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display5120x1440x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201029
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 11 '20 at 22:07
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Memory 80
1-Core 144
2-Core 283
91% 169 Pts
4-Core 499
8-Core 786
79% 643 Pts
64-Core 1,041
64% 1,041 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.7% Excellent
Lighting 102
Reflection 109
Parallax 104
83% 105 fps
MRender 96.6
Gravity 94.9
Splatting 97.4
79% 96.3 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 584 326 326 327 328 327 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
207% Outstanding
Read 2,028
Write 1,500
Mixed 568
SusWrite 370
246% 1,116 MB/s
4K Read 44.6
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 53.5
204% 75.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,076
DQ Write 780
DQ Mixed 683
577% 846 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 207%
Great: 236%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
423GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 435 435 443 444 324 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 442
Mixed 446
SusWrite 418
102% 452 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 86.3
4K Mixed 53.8
178% 60.6 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 200
150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 110%
Great: 129%
Hitachi HTS541010B7E610 1TB
786GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 118 117 117 119 120 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 140
Write 92.1
Mixed 75.5
SusWrite 117
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 6.7
4K Mixed 0.8
276% 3 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 72%
WD Elements 1TB
260GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Read 37.8
Write 29.1
Mixed 29.1
SusWrite 20.9
38% 29.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 43%
WDC WD10 EACS-00D6B1 1TB
300GB free, PID 0c25
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Read 35.6
Write 36.3
Mixed 27.7
SusWrite 21.1
40% 30.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
MC Read 38.8
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 38.1
96% 33.6 GB/s
SC Read 26.5
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 38.9
85% 29.7 GB/s
Latency 80.5
50% 80.5 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA Builds (Compare 3,010 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $802
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback