Asus X79-DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics33.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X79-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory20.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 11 '20 at 18:08
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2-$635
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Memory 82.8
1-Core 97.1
2-Core 193
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 355
8-Core 602
58% 478 Pts
64-Core 811
50% 811 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
EVGA(3842 2774) 2GB
CLim: 1267 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.3% Below average
Lighting 39.7
Reflection 40
Parallax 37.2
32% 39 fps
MRender 54.4
Gravity 39.7
Splatting 37.5
35% 43.9 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 36%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
543GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 313 315 129 69 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Read 331
Write 310
Mixed 290
SusWrite 204
64% 284 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 65.4
4K Mixed 39.9
131% 45.1 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 184
148% 209 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 126%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DHX DDR3 1600 C9 6x4GB
6 of 8 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.3% Above average
MC Read 22
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 18.8
53% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 13.2
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 75.5
53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79-DELUXE Builds (Compare 536 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus X79-DELUXE - $229

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $890
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback