Turbo-x E105

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics56.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive279% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemTurbo-x E105  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock A320M_HDV
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190304
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 11 '20 at 17:45
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Memory 77.6
1-Core 121
2-Core 213
77% 137 Pts
4-Core 414
8-Core 736
69% 575 Pts
64-Core 1,019
63% 1,019 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Lighting 71.4
Reflection 70
Parallax 90.1
58% 77.2 fps
MRender 70.8
Gravity 73.3
Splatting 56.9
54% 67 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
419GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2169 822 811 816 824 754 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
279% Outstanding
Read 2,546
Write 2,373
Mixed 1,821
SusWrite 1,032
435% 1,943 MB/s
4K Read 61.9
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 81.1
266% 90.7 MB/s
DQ Read 848
DQ Write 567
DQ Mixed 789
566% 735 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 279%
Great: 346%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 16GB
0, 0 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 30.7
MC Mixed 27.6
86% 30.2 GB/s
SC Read 23.6
SC Write 31.7
SC Mixed 26.3
78% 27.2 GB/s
Latency 85.1
47% 85.1 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical E105 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Turbo-x E105

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback