Toshiba SATELLITE C850D-11C

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 21% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE C850D-11C (all builds)
Motherboard	AMD PLCBX8
Memory	1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120907
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 11 '20 at 16:33
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E1-1200 APU 6,904 User benchmarks, average bench 23% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	18.8% Very poor	Memory 31.9 1-Core 17 2-Core 34 18% 27.6 Pts	4-Core 34.3 8-Core 33.2 5% 33.8 Pts	64-Core 33.8 2% 33.8 Pts
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 18.8% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7310 7,882 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Toshiba(1179 FB33) 384MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	0.86% Terrible	Lighting 1.03 Reflection 1.35 Parallax 1.28 1% 1.22 fps	MRender 1.24 Gravity 0.63 Splatting 1.35 1% 1.07 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.86% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM830 128GB 13,767 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 86GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM03D1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 168 214 229 211 231 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	37.7% Below average	Read 335 Write 287 Mixed 224 SusWrite 210 59% 264 MB/s	4K Read 6.7 4K Write 10.4 4K Mixed 8.2 26% 8.43 MB/s	DQ Read 80.6 DQ Write 64.9 DQ Mixed 75 56% 73.5 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 37.7% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8JSF25664HZ-1G4D1 HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 4GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 667, 667 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	11.5% Very poor	MC Read 4.1 MC Write 3.4 MC Mixed 4.2 11% 3.9 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 2.7 SC Mixed 3.7 9% 3.07 GB/s	Latency 244 16% 244 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SATELLITE C850D-11C Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 25%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE C850D-11C

CPU
E1-1200 APUAMDBench 23%, 6,904 samples	3x

GPU
Radeon HD 7310AMDBench 1%, 7,882 samples	3x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 37%, 7,983 samples	1x
M471B5173BH0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 26%, 3,473 samples	1x
HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 Elpida EBJ21UE8BFU0-DJ-F 6GBUnknownBench 21%, 14 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16