HP CQ1507LA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP CQ1507LA  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2ACC
Memory0.7 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110420
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 11 '20 at 04:42
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User PAN-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom D525-$250
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
27.4% Poor
Memory 50.8
1-Core 6.7
2-Core 14.6
20% 24 Pts
4-Core 25.5
8-Core 25.1
3% 25.3 Pts
64-Core 25.8
2% 25.8 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
410GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 16.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 117 116 117 117 118 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 93.6
Write 87.1
Mixed 38.2
SusWrite 116
61% 83.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
171% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
CE8 M471B5773CHS-CH9 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
11.3% Very poor
MC Read 4.4
MC Write 3.2
MC Mixed 3.1
10% 3.57 GB/s
SC Read 2.1
SC Write 2.9
SC Mixed 3.3
8% 2.77 GB/s
Latency 158
25% 158 ns
Poor: 5%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 12%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback