MSI B350M GAMING PRO (MS-7A39)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7A39
MotherboardMSI B350M GAMING PRO (MS-7A39)  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170428
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 11 '20 at 03:21
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X-$131
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 72.8
1-Core 111
2-Core 212
73% 132 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 577
60% 484 Pts
64-Core 590
36% 590 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Asus(1043 85D2) 2GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
28.1% Poor
Lighting 34.8
Reflection 25.5
Parallax 31.2
28% 30.5 fps
MRender 36.3
Gravity 33
Splatting 32.2
28% 33.8 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
235GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 459 459 463 412 348 349 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 458
Mixed 403
SusWrite 415
99% 441 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 86.3
4K Mixed 53.7
175% 60.1 MB/s
DQ Read 40.8
DQ Write 351
DQ Mixed 52.6
83% 148 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 109%
Great: 129%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
881GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 178 180 180 181 177 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 165
Mixed 97.2
SusWrite 179
116% 158 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
244% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 106%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$46
742GB free
Firmware: 07.01A07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 109 107 108 109 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
61.4% Good
Read 106
Write 107
Mixed 54.9
SusWrite 108
69% 93.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 62%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
662GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 165 166 167 167 168 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 167
Mixed 101
SusWrite 166
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
231% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 109%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 32GB
29GB free, PID 5595
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 22 21 21 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
15% Very poor
Read 34.2
Write 16.5
Mixed 21.9
SusWrite 20.9
30% 23.4 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1.5
118% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$35
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.2% Very good
MC Read 29.4
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 26.5
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 22.2
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 95
42% 95 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B350M GAMING PRO (MS-7A39) Builds (Compare 1,793 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI B350M GAMING PRO (MS-7A39) - $60

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $354
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback