HP 810-209

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics21.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP 810-209  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF3
Memory23.2 GB free of 28 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141024
Uptime4.4 Days
Run DateApr 27 '17 at 16:27
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Memory 82.1
1-Core 114
2-Core 228
79% 141 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 596
59% 482 Pts
64-Core 598
37% 598 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760 (192-bit)
HP(103C 6892) 1.5GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 376.54
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
21.1% Poor
Lighting 24.7
Reflection 25.3
Parallax 34.7
20% 28.2 fps
MRender 34.3
Gravity 28.5
Splatting 23.3
23% 28.7 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung Portable SSD T3 250GB
230GB free
Firmware: 0
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
70.9% Very good
Read 420
Write 352
Mixed 407
88% 393 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 38
4K Mixed 25.4
85% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 72.3
73% 117 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 75%
Crucial MTFDDAK128MAM-1J1 500GB
123GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
109% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 455
Mixed 501
108% 484 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 91.6
4K Mixed 52.2
169% 59.8 MB/s
DQ Read 285
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 155
126% 183 MB/s
Poor: 97%
This bench: 109%
Great: 110%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
616GB free
Firmware: CC29 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 152
Write 105
Mixed 109
92% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.44
4K Mixed 0.25
72% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
283GB free
Firmware: HP51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 109
Write 93.6
Mixed 123
82% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.48
4K Mixed 0.2
69% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 M378B1G73DB0-CK0 M378B1G73DB0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 28GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
54.5% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 15.8
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 19.6
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 810-209 Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: HP 810-209

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $120
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback