Asrock H270 Performance

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics37% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive286% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H270 Performance  (all builds)
Memory14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161205
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 27 '17 at 14:30
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Memory 94.3
1-Core 125
2-Core 254
88% 158 Pts
4-Core 499
8-Core 713
76% 606 Pts
64-Core 709
44% 709 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 376.53
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
37% Below average
Lighting 48.2
Reflection 32.9
Parallax 39.2
39% 40.1 fps
MRender 38.6
Gravity 43.3
Splatting 37.9
33% 39.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 37%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
438GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
286% Outstanding
Read 2,822
Write 1,390
Mixed 1,443
414% 1,885 MB/s
4K Read 57.4
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 50.7
221% 79.5 MB/s
DQ Read 576
DQ Write 427
DQ Mixed 186
224% 396 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 286%
Great: 254%
WD Blue 500GB-$94
399GB free
Firmware: X41100WD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 498
Write 349
Mixed 306
85% 384 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 44.1
4K Mixed 20.9
91% 30.8 MB/s
DQ Read 341
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 43.7
96% 200 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 81%
Great: 107%
SanDisk Extreme 128GB
2GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
Read 233
Write 148
Mixed 119
194% 167 MB/s
4K Read 7.24
4K Write 9.26
4K Mixed 2.61
431% 6.37 MB/s
DQ Read 8.59
DQ Write 9.22
DQ Mixed 2.88
444% 6.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GB-$42
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
MC Read 31.2
MC Write 32.2
MC Mixed 23.4
83% 28.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.1
SC Write 33.7
SC Mixed 23.1
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 59
68% 59 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H270 Performance Builds (Compare 340 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asrock H270 Performance

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $609
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback