PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 27.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Apple MacPro3,1 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Apple Mac-F42C88C8 |
Memory | 29 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20080229 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Nov 10 '20 at 10:45 |
Run Duration | 136 Seconds |
Run User | CHE-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5462
CPU-A ( 0 ), 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
|
46.3%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2126 MHz, MLim: 1852 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.77
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32080RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 155 77 105 38 51 MB/s
|
27.8%
Poor
|
|||
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
69GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 192 198 198 200 200 MB/s
|
56.7%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
22.7%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E54621stBench 47%, 772 samples | 98x |
Xeon E5462IntelBench 48%, 662 samples | 19x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X54821stBench 49%, 298 samples | 15x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 680Nvidia $360Bench 32%, 38,995 samples | 22x |
Radeon HD 2600-XTATIBench 2%, 1,081 samples | 11x |
GeForce 8800 GTNvidiaBench 6%, 5,568 samples | 11x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 21% - Poor | Total price: $388 |