bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive95.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory112GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 112GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
Run History
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory105.3 GB free of 112 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181207
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 09 '20 at 21:56
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC 7V12 64-Core
None, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.45 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
64.6% Good
Memory 62.3
1-Core 114
2-Core 223
72% 133 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 736
64% 547 Pts
64-Core 2,275
141% 2,275 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 74%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual HD 136GB
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 253 248 252 250 252 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 216
Mixed 493
SusWrite 252
81% 364 MB/s
4K Read 65
4K Write 44
4K Mixed 45.6
180% 51.5 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 97.8
82% 120 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 78%
Virtual HD 756GB
688GB free
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 232 236 233 235 233 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Read 490
Write 482
Mixed 492
SusWrite 233
95% 424 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 44.9
4K Mixed 33.7
107% 35.1 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 130
98% 130 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 112GB
null MHz
1024, 32767, 32767, 32767, 15363 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
220% Outstanding
MC Read 85.6
MC Write 77.4
MC Mixed 113
263% 92.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 30.2
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 220%
Great: 215%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,458 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback