Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 18% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	7.37% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	28.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Sempron Dual Core 2100 27 User benchmarks, average bench 32% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	31.4% Below average	Memory 54.8 1-Core 26.1 2-Core 41.6 29% 40.8 Pts	4-Core 49.6 8-Core 49.8 7% 49.7 Pts	64-Core 51.5 3% 51.5 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 49%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8570 3,522 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Dell(1028 2121) 1GB CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.1 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	7.37% Terrible	Lighting 9.4 Reflection 9.04 Parallax 10.6 8% 9.68 fps	MRender 8.14 Gravity 7.93 Splatting 8.7 7% 8.26 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.37% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU 650 120GB 342 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 16GB free (System drive) Firmware: V8X0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 34 34 27 28 12 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	28.8% Poor	Read 141 Write 48.7 Mixed 36.4 SusWrite 29.1 14% 63.8 MB/s	4K Read 18.2 4K Write 26.7 4K Mixed 18.2 65% 21 MB/s	DQ Read 23 DQ Write 34.3 DQ Mixed 16.8 16% 24.7 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 82%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 2x1GB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 2 of 4 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR2 333 MHz Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	15.7% Very poor	MC Read 6.7 MC Write 4.4 MC Mixed 4.5 15% 5.2 GB/s	SC Read 4.4 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 3.3 12% 4.07 GB/s	Latency 144 28% 144 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 25%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	1x
GTX 560 TiNvidia $188Bench 16%, 42,397 samples	1x
GeForce 6150SE nForce 430NvidiaBench 0%, 4,836 samples	1x

SSD
SS DSC2BW180A3H 180GBIntelBench 63%, 50 samples	2x
SSD Plus 120GBSanDisk $42Bench 58%, 87,912 samples	1x

RAM
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	2x
NT2GT64U8HD0BY-AD Elpida EBE21UE8AFFA-8G-F 4GBNanyaBench 23%, 4 samples	2x

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $92

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16