Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics30% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-970A-UD3  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121022
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 26 '17 at 20:36
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$125
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
69.7% Good
Memory 91.8
1-Core 68.1
2-Core 137
62% 99 Pts
4-Core 258
8-Core 388
40% 323 Pts
64-Core 388
24% 388 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
MSI(1462 3030) 2GB
CLim: 1080 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.4.3
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
30% Below average
Lighting 38.1
Reflection 34
Parallax 45.9
31% 39.3 fps
MRender 30.1
Gravity 32
Splatting 38.7
28% 33.6 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 30%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$31
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32080RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 504
Write 416
Mixed 456
102% 459 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 60.6
4K Mixed 4.16
65% 27.6 MB/s
DQ Read 22.4
DQ Write 69.4
DQ Mixed 4.2
15% 32 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
730GB free
Firmware: CC27 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Read 200
Write 135
Mixed 128
116% 155 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 5.55
4K Mixed 0.3
153% 2.08 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
50.8% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 18
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 14
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-970A-UD3 Builds (Compare 505 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $517
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback