MSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics64.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive91% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201030
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateNov 08 '20 at 10:41
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Memory 74.1
1-Core 143
2-Core 280
89% 166 Pts
4-Core 486
8-Core 811
79% 649 Pts
64-Core 1036
64% 1036 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2031 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.09
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.2% Good
Lighting 80.4
Reflection 81
Parallax 70.2
66% 77.2 fps
MRender 73
Gravity 75.2
Splatting 76.2
62% 74.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 3 479GB
290GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 868 875 870 884 892 885 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
91% Outstanding
Read 344
Write 160
Mixed 172
SusWrite 879
88% 389 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 26.4
4K Mixed 15.5
58% 19.3 MB/s
DQ Read 26.5
DQ Write 237
DQ Mixed 156
114% 140 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 91%
Great: 110%
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
22GB free
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 64 45 43 103 43 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 363
Write 343
Mixed 266
SusWrite 82.7
59% 263 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 64.5
4K Mixed 22.4
102% 37.7 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 117
105% 157 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 85%
Amd-raid Samsung SSD 750 250GB
232GB free
Firmware: MAT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 227 223 228 226 226 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 405
Write 368
Mixed 283
SusWrite 237
72% 323 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 52
4K Mixed 33.1
114% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 101
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 113
94% 132 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 76%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 191 193 192 192 193 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 144
Mixed 78.5
SusWrite 190
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 104%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.3% Very good
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 28.9
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 22.3
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 28.2
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 92.3
43% 92.3 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570-A PRO (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 6,091 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37) - $160

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $993
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback