Pcchips A15G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics6.95% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive32.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPcchips A15G  (all builds)
MotherboardPCCHIPS A15G
Memory0.7 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090813
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateNov 08 '20 at 06:57
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Sempron 140-$9
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Memory 72.4
1-Core 39.4
2-Core 38.3
37% 50 Pts
4-Core 38.4
8-Core 37.3
5% 37.8 Pts
64-Core 37.6
2% 37.6 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 240
Dell(1028 2121) 1GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
6.95% Terrible
Lighting 8.6
Reflection 9.04
Parallax 10.5
7% 9.39 fps
MRender 8.19
Gravity 7.97
Splatting 8.7
7% 8.28 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.95%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU 650 120GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 27 29 30 19 21 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.8% Below average
Read 141
Write 40.5
Mixed 59.3
SusWrite 26.5
15% 66.8 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 36
4K Mixed 22.5
78% 26.2 MB/s
DQ Read 22.9
DQ Write 34
DQ Mixed 18.7
17% 25.2 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 2x1GB
2 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2 333 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
18.4% Very poor
MC Read 6
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 6
17% 5.87 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 2.7
12% 4.33 GB/s
Latency 96
42% 96 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A15G Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Pcchips A15G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $92
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback