Asrock 970 Performance

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics32.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Performance  (all builds)
Memory21.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141117
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 08 '20 at 01:47
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$125
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 84
1-Core 82.4
2-Core 143
63% 103 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 435
46% 365 Pts
64-Core 494
31% 494 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
MSI(1462 3030) 2GB
CLim: 1147 MHz, MLim: 1496 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
32.3% Below average
Lighting 40.7
Reflection 36.7
Parallax 49.1
33% 42.2 fps
MRender 32.4
Gravity 35.8
Splatting 41.6
30% 36.6 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ENGFASAAPSTBT120GB 120GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V2206
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 53 54 55 55 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
32.4% Below average
Read 290
Write 67
Mixed 91.5
SusWrite 84
29% 133 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 20.4
4K Mixed 10.8
50% 15.9 MB/s
DQ Read 16.7
DQ Write 19.4
DQ Mixed 18
14% 18 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 65%
Toshiba MG04ACA200EY 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: FQ1B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 175 178 177 174 176 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 168
Mixed 80.5
SusWrite 176
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1.1
223% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Dark-2133 Dark-2133 F3-1600C9-8GXM F3-1600C9-8GXM 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.5% Average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 17.2
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 13.4
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Performance Builds (Compare 57 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Performance

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $311
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback