Asrock FM2A55M-VG3+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock FM2A55M-VG3+  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 07 '20 at 18:05
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-4000 APU-$171
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
37% Below average
Memory 60.6
1-Core 46.6
2-Core 77.3
40% 61.5 Pts
4-Core 80.2
8-Core 79.6
11% 79.9 Pts
64-Core 82.8
5% 82.8 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 37%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7480D
ASRock(1849 9993) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
2.38% Terrible
Lighting 2.73
Reflection 4.04
Parallax 2.22
2% 3 fps
MRender 3.62
Gravity 1.83
Splatting 4.04
3% 3.17 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.38%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
889GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 144 157 104 69 114 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Read 175
Write 161
Mixed 78.3
SusWrite 114
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 9905584-015.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.9% Poor
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 5
MC Mixed 8.4
24% 8.33 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 8.5
23% 7.9 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A55M-VG3+ Builds (Compare 70 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A55M-VG3+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $171
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback