Acer Aspire E1-531

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire E1-531  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer EA50_HC_HR
Memory6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121116
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 07 '20 at 17:59
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron B830
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
49% Average
Memory 82.9
1-Core 47.5
2-Core 86.2
48% 72.2 Pts
4-Core 92.5
8-Core 88.7
12% 90.6 Pts
64-Core 93
6% 93 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 49%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)
Acer(1025 0649) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
1.06% Terrible
Lighting 1.07
Reflection 1.38
Parallax 0.91
1% 1.12 fps
MRender 1.71
Gravity 1.5
Splatting 1.91
1% 1.71 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 1.06%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 149 64 62 64 62 MB/s
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.2% Average
Read 256
Write 242
Mixed 225
SusWrite 117
47% 210 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 42.4
4K Mixed 22.9
86% 29.4 MB/s
DQ Read 29.1
DQ Write 70.7
DQ Mixed 30.1
29% 43.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 100%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
1GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 28.8
Write 19.8
Mixed 16.2
26% 21.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.2
39% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SH564128FJ8NWRNSQR SH564128FH8NZPHSCR 8GB
1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
44.4% Average
MC Read 15
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 15.2
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 10.8
30% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E1-531 Builds (Compare 421 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E1-531

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback