Dell Latitude E5510

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemDell Latitude E5510  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 09M4GV
Memory0.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20101118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 07 '20 at 17:47
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 560-$65
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
47.7% Average
Memory 65.7
1-Core 78.9
2-Core 120
53% 88.1 Pts
4-Core 173
8-Core 173
23% 173 Pts
64-Core 178
11% 178 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 48%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK1665GSX 160GB-$125
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GJ00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 67 65 55 68 74 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
20.7% Poor
Read 7.7
Write 38.6
Mixed 7.2
SusWrite 64.2
21% 29.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.2
47% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 49%
USB 2.0 Flash Disk 1GB
1GB free, PID 3234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 3.1 3.1 3.1 2.9 3.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
2.96% Terrible
Read 10.7
Write 2.2
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 3
6% 5.02 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.96%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT312S6BFR6C-H9 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
21.6% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 9.3
23% 7.93 GB/s
SC Read 0.9
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 0
6% 2.2 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude E5510 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E5510

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 38% - Below average Total price: $133
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback