HP 510-p109

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	22.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	67.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	HP 510-p109 (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 822A
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161007
Uptime	5 Days
Run Date	Nov 07 '20 at 05:18
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A12-9800 APU (2016 M.BR) 4,241 User benchmarks, average bench 44% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	45.1% Average	Memory 48.3 1-Core 78.7 2-Core 127 48% 84.6 Pts	4-Core 242 8-Core 242 32% 242 Pts	64-Core 243 15% 243 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90 64,240 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Sapphire(174B E348) CLim: 1216 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.4.2 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	22.3% Poor	Lighting 25.3 Reflection 31.2 Parallax 30.4 21% 29 fps	MRender 31 Gravity 25.5 Splatting 35 25% 30.5 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 22.3% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS1311 240GB-$78 26,547 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 144GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS131122 SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 199 95 138 170 171 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	67.3% Good	Read 456 Write 281 Mixed 368 SusWrite 175 71% 320 MB/s	4K Read 22 4K Write 45.1 4K Mixed 22.8 86% 30 MB/s	DQ Read 288 DQ Write 251 DQ Mixed 216 177% 252 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 97%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2TB free Firmware: MX4OAC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 193 191 199 200 198 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	114% Outstanding	Read 203 Write 178 Mixed 42.6 SusWrite 196 112% 155 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.4 97% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 108%
WD Elements 25A1 2TB 7,574 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 2TB free, PID 25a1 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 115 114 115 113 114 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	64.3% Good	Read 140 Write 116 Mixed 70 SusWrite 114 144% 110 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 6.1 4K Mixed 0.8 239% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP24D4U7S8MBP-8 2x8GB 1,295 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	43.5% Average	MC Read 19.6 MC Write 10.4 MC Mixed 19.6 47% 16.5 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 10.7 27% 9.47 GB/s	Latency 167 24% 167 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 87%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 510-p109 Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: HP 510-p109

CPU
A12-9800 APU (2016 M.BR)AMDBench 44%, 4,241 samples	16x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 37,078 samples	14x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	1x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	1x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	1x
HyperX 120GBKingstonBench 67%, 3,401 samples	1x
Ultimate SU800 512GBAdata $71Bench 104%, 31,280 samples	1x

RAM
M378A1K43BB1-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 67%, 6,881 samples	9x
HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 74%, 20,415 samples	2x
M378A1G43DB0-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 72%, 8,407 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 26% - Poor

Total price: $90

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16