HP Desktop 460-p274

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.98% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive119% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Desktop 460-p274  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 82F2
Memory22.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181101
Uptime23.8 Days
Run DateNov 07 '20 at 01:41
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 61%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
67.3% Good
Memory 74.2
1-Core 102
2-Core 198
70% 125 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 502
51% 414 Pts
64-Core 532
33% 532 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
HP(103C 82F2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7925
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
6.98% Terrible
Lighting 7.33
Reflection 9.85
Parallax 7.66
6% 8.28 fps
MRender 10.5
Gravity 6.43
Splatting 14.4
9% 10.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.98%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M81000G 1TB
413GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 558 172 746 500 487 313 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 1044
Write 1,066
Mixed 499
SusWrite 463
172% 768 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 51.3
4K Mixed 28
95% 33.4 MB/s
DQ Read 501
DQ Write 380
DQ Mixed 430
324% 437 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 119%
Great: 311%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
931GB free
Firmware: HPH4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 187 188 190 192 183 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 195
Write 75.5
Mixed 80.3
SusWrite 188
99% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 110%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GF2X08LIII43-12-K 32GB
2666, 2666 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile)
60.8% Good
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 24.7
MC Mixed 21.2
63% 22 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 16
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 92
44% 92 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Desktop 460-p274 Builds (Compare 41 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP Desktop 460-p274

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback