EVGA 132-CK-NF78

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics7.41% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive24.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardEVGA 132-CK-NF78  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091230
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 07 '20 at 01:01
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E6500-$100
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.95 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
41.7% Average
Memory 64.6
1-Core 44.7
2-Core 104
43% 70.9 Pts
4-Core 111
8-Core 111
15% 111 Pts
64-Core 100
6% 100 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640
Nvidia(10DE 093C) 1GB
CLim: 950 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
7.41% Terrible
Lighting 8.4
Reflection 8.08
Parallax 10.2
7% 8.91 fps
MRender 8.9
Gravity 10.5
Splatting 11.3
8% 10.2 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.41%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
3 48 0GB SSD
302GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 47 46 41 50 57 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.8% Poor
Read 186
Write 83.2
Mixed 36.2
SusWrite 47
19% 88 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 29.8
4K Mixed 3.6
48% 17.2 MB/s
DQ Read 26.7
DQ Write 29.9
DQ Mixed 1.4
8% 19.3 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DRAM
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.4% Very poor
MC Read 6
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 5
16% 5.53 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 4.8
14% 4.8 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 132-CK-NF78 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: EVGA 132-CK-NF78

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $396
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback