Medion Akoya P5330 E MD8876/2459

Performance Results


Gaming 54% Yacht	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 43% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	66% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Medion Akoya P5330 E MD8876/2459 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION H110H4-EM
Memory	11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160304
Uptime	2 Days
Run Date	Apr 25 '17 at 10:21
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	45%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6402P 15,913 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	74.8% Very good	Memory 83.2 1-Core 102 2-Core 196 73% 127 Pts	4-Core 381 8-Core 401 52% 391 Pts	64-Core 397 25% 397 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Sapphire(174B 6438) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2126 MHz, MLim: 2352 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 381.65 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	66% Good	Lighting 81.8 Reflection 82.7 Parallax 72.8 67% 79.1 fps	MRender 83.2 Gravity 75.6 Splatting 78.8 65% 79.2 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 66% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTY128HDHP-00000 128GB 2,542 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 31GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT2100Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1188 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 341 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 98 98 12 (AE) Unknown 99 99 8 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 915 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 60 54 40 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 1 (E9) Unknown 98 98 16525556 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1882 (F2) Unknown 99 99 1777 (F9) Unknown 99 99 1882	107% Outstanding	Read 514 Write 487 Mixed 496 112% 499 MB/s	4K Read 37.2 4K Write 81.9 4K Mixed 41.8 153% 53.6 MB/s	DQ Read 304 DQ Write 141 DQ Mixed 78.6 96% 174 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 102%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 173 171 4333 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 464 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1122 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 339 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 9 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 186 186 44141 (C2) HDA temperature 115 109 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	89.3% Excellent	Read 158 Write 153 Mixed 143 114% 151 MB/s	4K Read 0.73 4K Write 2.36 4K Mixed 0.28 105% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 89.3% Great: 84%
Seagate ST31000333AS 1TB-$750 12,067 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 845GB free Firmware: BD15 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 108 99 20336774 (03) Spinup time 94 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 8550 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 3 (07) Seek error rate 82 60 192940701 (09) Power-on hours count 84 84 14247 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 6 (0C) Power cycle count 96 37 4571 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 96 12885557919 (BD) vendor-specific 61 61 39 (BE) vendor-specific 52 43 3703068688432 (C2) HDA temperature 48 57 25769803824 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 29 24 20336774 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	57.1% Above average	Read 99.4 Write 99.4 Mixed 94.6 74% 97.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.72 4K Write 1.57 4K Mixed 0.43 106% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905625-062.A00G Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 16GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	75.9% Very good	MC Read 27.7 MC Write 29.9 MC Mixed 25.3 79% 27.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.7 SC Write 27.1 SC Mixed 20.2 58% 20.3 GB/s	Latency 74.9 53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 78%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Akoya P5330 E MD8876/2459 Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 15%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

System: Medion Akoya P5330 E MD8876/2459

CPU
Core i5-6402PIntelBench 68%, 15,913 samples	24x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	18x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	2x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	2x

SSD
MZNTY128HDHP-00000 128GBSamsungBench 80%, 2,542 samples	10x
CT500MX500SSD4 500GBBench 106%, 44,418 samples	2x
Ultra 3D 250GBSanDisk $50Bench 85%, 5,775 samples	1x

RAM
M378A1G43DB0-CPB 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 6,175 samples	10x
CT16G4DFD832A.M16FR 2x16GBCrucialBench 94%, 75 samples	4x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GBCorsairBench 73%, 16,624 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $92

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16