HP EliteBook 850 G2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.16% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive49.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP EliteBook 850 G2  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2216
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200224
Uptime12.1 Days
Run DateNov 05 '20 at 21:49
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User MDA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5300U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
60.2% Good
Memory 81.4
1-Core 91
2-Core 159
66% 111 Pts
4-Core 228
8-Core 227
30% 227 Pts
64-Core 230
14% 230 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
HP(103C 2216) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
5.16% Terrible
Lighting 5.37
Reflection 7.27
Parallax 6.69
4% 6.44 fps
MRender 7.62
Gravity 4.97
Splatting 10.9
7% 7.82 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.16%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PD128HCFV-000H1 128GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM01H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 84 94 64 49 44 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.2% Average
Read 164
Write 79.8
Mixed 136
SusWrite 72.2
25% 113 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 75.6
4K Mixed 21.1
97% 38.9 MB/s
DQ Read 325
DQ Write 81.5
DQ Mixed 91.1
96% 166 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 107%
Transcend TS240GMTS420S 240GB
15GB free
Firmware: S0130B0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 444
Write 356
Mixed 357
86% 386 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 85.2
4K Mixed 17.1
94% 40 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 32.1
82% 167 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 Kingston 99U5469-055.A00LF 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
48.7% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 14.9
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 14.5
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 77.9
51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 850 G2 Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 850 G2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback