Asus Z170-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z170-P  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160919
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 25 '17 at 06:13
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 79.1
1-Core 89.8
2-Core 186
68% 118 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 380
51% 379 Pts
64-Core 392
24% 392 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 21.20.16.4534
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
4.65% Terrible
Lighting 4.9
Reflection 7.69
Parallax 4.75
4% 5.78 fps
MRender 5.48
Gravity 4.07
Splatting 10.7
6% 6.75 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.65%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Drevo X1 SSD 120GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0510D Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Read 507
Write 323
Mixed 372
89% 401 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 96.3
4K Mixed 23.9
126% 49.9 MB/s
DQ Read 29.9
DQ Write 255
DQ Mixed 67.1
74% 117 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 91%
Seagate ST3250310AS 250GB-$44
163GB free
Firmware: 3.AHC Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 89.5
Write 88.9
Mixed 83.9
66% 87.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 1.29
4K Mixed 0.42
100% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
36.5% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 10.6
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 12.2
SC Mixed 9.5
27% 9.4 GB/s
Latency 82.3
49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170-P Builds (Compare 4,241 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170-P - $119

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $667
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback