Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics45.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemGigabyte X399 AORUS PRO
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF  (all builds)
Memory23.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 05 '20 at 11:17
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 24%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 2920X
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Memory 53.1
1-Core 128
2-Core 256
76% 146 Pts
4-Core 495
8-Core 941
85% 718 Pts
64-Core 1920
119% 1920 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Gigabyte(1458 3FCC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.09
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
45.8% Average
Lighting 59.6
Reflection 52.2
Parallax 43
48% 51.6 fps
MRender 45.9
Gravity 52
Splatting 50.3
41% 49.4 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$235
331GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 415 430 427 422 393 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 235
Mixed 292
SusWrite 414
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 68.1
4K Mixed 30.5
108% 40.1 MB/s
DQ Read 355
DQ Write 240
DQ Mixed 215
183% 270 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 133%
Intel 520 Series 240GB-$139
24GB free
Firmware: 400i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 202 232 233 216 234 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
79.6% Very good
Read 387
Write 262
Mixed 276
SusWrite 221
64% 287 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 62.2
4K Mixed 34.4
125% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 304
DQ Write 243
DQ Mixed 263
200% 270 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 95%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$120
208GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 103 104 105 104 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 79.5
Write 75.7
Mixed 55
SusWrite 104
58% 78.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
171% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 87%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
494GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 58 57 58 58 59 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 68.6
Write 62.4
Mixed 75.1
SusWrite 57.8
49% 66 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
69.6% Good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 23.3
MC Mixed 24.3
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 23.3
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 24.7
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 150
27% 150 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF Builds (Compare 259 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $1,079
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback