Asus ZenBook UX434FLC_UX434FL

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive227% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 78% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAsus ZenBook UX434FLC_UX434FL  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK UX434FLC
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display504 x 1000 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191218
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 04 '20 at 21:50
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU5%
CPU Throttled 78%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10510U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
74% Very good
Memory 68.5
1-Core 131
2-Core 248
81% 149 Pts
4-Core 429
8-Core 606
65% 517 Pts
64-Core 585
36% 585 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 74%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce MX250
Asus(1043 150F) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4294
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
12% Very poor
Lighting 14.1
Reflection 14.8
Parallax 15.5
12% 14.8 fps
MRender 16.4
Gravity 14.5
Splatting 16.2
13% 15.7 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
881GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 988 1067 1116 1231 1031 630 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
227% Outstanding
Read 1,842
Write 1,338
Mixed 1298
SusWrite 1,010
307% 1,372 MB/s
4K Read 51.6
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 66.6
220% 74.7 MB/s
DQ Read 710
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 532
388% 517 MB/s
Poor: 145%
This bench: 227%
Great: 329%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4EBE304ED-EGCG 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
69.3% Good
MC Read 25.7
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 21.8
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 21.4
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZenBook UX434FLC_UX434FL Builds (Compare 255 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ZenBook UX434FLC_UX434FL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback