Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 18% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	2.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium 5405U 2,193 User benchmarks, average bench 48% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	15.7% Very poor	Memory 5.52 1-Core 55.1 2-Core 34 18% 31.5 Pts	4-Core 143 8-Core 172 20% 158 Pts	64-Core 164 10% 164 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 610 3,878 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Device(1854 0327) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6577 Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	2.28% Terrible	Lighting 2.1 Reflection 2.92 Parallax 2.5 2% 2.51 fps	MRender 2.95 Gravity 2.67 Splatting 5.96 3% 3.86 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.28% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN128HAHQ-00000 128GB 3,089 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 30GB free (System drive) Firmware: MVT2300Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 125 113 95 105 101 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	28.2% Poor	Read 176 Write 202 Mixed 152 SusWrite 112 36% 160 MB/s	4K Read 5.6 4K Write 9.3 4K Mixed 5.7 21% 6.87 MB/s	DQ Read 227 DQ Write 133 DQ Mixed 131 111% 164 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
MEM-DOWN 1x4GB 64 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	22.6% Poor	MC Read 9.9 MC Write 9.3 MC Mixed 7.8 26% 9 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 2.9 10% 3.47 GB/s	Latency 447 9% 447 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 22.6% Great: 37%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM