Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics35.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 24 '17 at 18:27
Run Duration259 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 94.1
1-Core 153
2-Core 306
101% 184 Pts
4-Core 611
8-Core 853
92% 732 Pts
64-Core 853
53% 853 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 104%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 381.65
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Lighting 46.9
Reflection 45
Parallax 39.9
38% 43.9 fps
MRender 39.2
Gravity 41.1
Splatting 36
32% 38.8 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSCKKF240H6 240GB
197GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LSF036P Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Read 511
Write 390
Mixed 385
95% 429 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 79.4
4K Mixed 24
107% 42 MB/s
DQ Read 25.2
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 19.8
31% 56.3 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 97%
HyperX Fury 240GB-$193
175GB free
Firmware: 603ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 472
Write 163
Mixed 235
63% 290 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 86.3
4K Mixed 11.2
88% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 22.5
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 11.1
27% 52.5 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 84%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA330 2TB
873GB free
Firmware: JKAOA20N Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 114
Write 113
Mixed 113
85% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.3
78% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 70%
Toshiba DT01ABA300 3TB
320GB free
Firmware: MZ6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
75.9% Very good
Read 128
Write 137
Mixed 121
97% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.74
4K Mixed 0.17
69% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 88%
Verbatim Store n Go V3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
11GB free, PID 0243
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Read 79
Write 9.06
Mixed 13.7
30% 33.9 MB/s
4K Read 8.47
4K Write 0.03
4K Mixed 0.07
35% 2.86 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB-$42
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
74.1% Very good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 20.6
73% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 27.6
SC Mixed 24.3
67% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 59.6
67% 59.6 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,906 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $629
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback