Apple iMac18,3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics37.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemApple iMac18,3  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-BE088AF8C5EB4FA2
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display5120 x 2880 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200616
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateNov 04 '20 at 12:41
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$89
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Memory 92.2
1-Core 123
2-Core 240
86% 152 Pts
4-Core 468
8-Core 421
61% 444 Pts
64-Core 452
28% 452 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro 570
Apple(106B 0163) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1695 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.30.01.53
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
37.8% Below average
Lighting 46.3
Reflection 51.7
Parallax 56.1
38% 51.4 fps
MRender 53.2
Gravity 42.6
Splatting 43.8
38% 46.5 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 38%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545016B9A300 160GB-$30
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 45 47 45 48 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
28.3% Poor
Read 54.6
Write 50.2
Mixed 27.6
SusWrite 43.9
32% 44.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 34%
Trust HDD 2.5" 640GB
596GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 41 41 41 41 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22.5% Poor
Read 37.4
Write 40
Mixed 29.4
SusWrite 40.8
27% 36.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x344154463531323634485A2D3247334532202020 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
70.3% Very good
MC Read 27.9
MC Write 25.2
MC Mixed 20.4
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 25.9
SC Mixed 23.2
63% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 63.7
63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac18,3 Builds (Compare 428 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Apple iMac18,3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $89
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback