Asus P8Z68-V PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8Z68-V PRO  (all builds)
Memory8.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 24 '17 at 16:15
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 91.7
1-Core 93
2-Core 185
73% 123 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 457
48% 386 Pts
64-Core 452
28% 452 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Nvidia(10DE 0984) 2GB
CLim: 1280 MHz, MLim: 1552 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.92
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
28.7% Poor
Lighting 33.7
Reflection 30.4
Parallax 38.8
28% 34.3 fps
MRender 42.2
Gravity 39.5
Splatting 34.3
31% 38.7 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 580ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
55% Above average
Read 335
Write 153
Mixed 204
51% 231 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 44.6
4K Mixed 16.4
83% 28.9 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 52.8
72% 132 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 55%
Great: 87%
WD WD5000AACS-00ZUB0 500GB
146GB free
Firmware: 05.04C05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 63.4
Write 70.4
Mixed 68.5
51% 67.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.81
4K Mixed 0.32
88% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-406.A00LF 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.7% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 8.2
24% 8.47 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 8.7
24% 8.27 GB/s
Latency 64.7
62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z68-V PRO Builds (Compare 1,456 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V PRO - $390

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $985
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback