TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory60.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200701
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 04 '20 at 00:36
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Memory 69.4
1-Core 153
2-Core 305
92% 176 Pts
4-Core 601
8-Core 1,042
99% 821 Pts
64-Core 1,458
90% 1,458 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑
This bench: 90.9%
 Great: 94%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 1TB-$100
773GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0918B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 410 382 391 398 405 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 420
Mixed 382
SusWrite 400
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 89.8
4K Mixed 49.2
163% 57.9 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 110
106% 168 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑
This bench: 105%
 Great: 126%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.7% Good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 26.5
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 27
63% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 65% ↑
This bench: 67.7%
 Great: 105%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,056 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $105

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD  $190Bench 86%, 635,419 samples4,683x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD  $190Bench 98%, 128,080 samples4,318x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD  $120Bench 96%, 383,420 samples3,448x
GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia  $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples2,259x
RTX 3080Nvidia  $700Bench 187%, 424,051 samples2,089x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia  $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples1,476x
SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $102Bench 310%, 455,997 samples1,850x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $105Bench 394%, 276,089 samples1,110x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples869x
RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples776x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples731x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair  $120Bench 89%, 144,399 samples650x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $937
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback