Asus P8Z77-V PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics91.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive72.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V PRO  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 03 '20 at 19:11
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
79.8% Very good
Memory 93.4
1-Core 111
2-Core 205
80% 136 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 555
56% 456 Pts
64-Core 574
36% 574 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$291
Asus(1043 8734) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91.8% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 119
Parallax 109
96% 116 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 95.5
Splatting 82.3
83% 104 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM03B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 242 176 139 212 229 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 351
Write 292
Mixed 236
SusWrite 196
60% 269 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 72.6
4K Mixed 31
118% 43.3 MB/s
DQ Read 245
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 114
114% 186 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 116%
Kingston SKC2500M8500G 500GB
237GB free
Firmware: S7780100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 819 664 649 659 671 658 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
197% Outstanding
Read 1,303
Write 1002
Mixed 1,052
SusWrite 686
226% 1,011 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 75.5
222% 80.8 MB/s
DQ Read 827
DQ Write 610
DQ Mixed 544
454% 660 MB/s
Poor: 163%
This bench: 197%
Great: 334%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25
127GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 103 104 105 105 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 103
Write 98.5
Mixed 77.4
SusWrite 104
71% 95.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 65%
WD WD3200KS-00PFB0 320GB
286GB free
Firmware: 21.00M21
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 63 62 61 61 63 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Read 61.9
Write 62.2
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 62.1
43% 58.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 36%
Maxtor 6B200M0 137GB
71GB free
Firmware: BANC1B70
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 58 57 57 57 57 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.8% Below average
Read 59.3
Write 62.1
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 57.6
39% 53.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.8
182% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 34%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25
555GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 109 112 112 112 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 112
Write 105
Mixed 69.8
SusWrite 110
73% 99.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
58.5% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 18
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 19.1
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 61.2
65% 61.2 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-V PRO Builds (Compare 2,092 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V PRO - $400

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $851
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4070 $515Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback