Asus M2N-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics9.69% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M2N-E  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100323
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 03 '20 at 18:15
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 640-$70
Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Memory 37.6
1-Core 44.5
2-Core 88.5
33% 56.9 Pts
4-Core 175
8-Core 175
23% 175 Pts
64-Core 176
11% 176 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6700
Asus(1043 03F6) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
9.69% Terrible
Lighting 12.7
Reflection 10
Parallax 10.8
10% 11.2 fps
MRender 9.33
Gravity 9.33
Splatting 11.4
8% 10 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.69%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
290GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 48 76 77 80 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 107
Write 94.2
Mixed 61.9
SusWrite 66.4
61% 82.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 62%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80
70GB free
Firmware: 3.AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 43 46 54 54 51 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
31.8% Below average
Read 62.1
Write 63.5
Mixed 40.6
SusWrite 48.5
40% 53.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
MC Read 5.4
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 5.5
16% 5.53 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 5.2
14% 4.8 GB/s
Latency 214
19% 214 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M2N-E Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M2N-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $152
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback