Asus H110M-A

Performance Results


Gaming 56% Gunboat	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 43% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	90.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	88.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-A (all builds)
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160125
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Nov 03 '20 at 03:54
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	100%

Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6402P 15,913 User benchmarks, average bench 68% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	58.5% Above average	Memory 81.1 1-Core 79.4 2-Core 130 60% 97 Pts	4-Core 199 8-Core 265 29% 232 Pts	64-Core 249 15% 249 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407 316,424 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 8662) CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.09 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	90.8% Outstanding	Lighting 155 Reflection 158 Parallax 169 126% 161 fps	MRender 28.4 Gravity 18.7 Splatting 30.2 21% 25.8 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 90.8% Great: 134%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130 75,831 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 41GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 326 191 134 39 37 37 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	88.5% Excellent	Read 490 Write 478 Mixed 321 SusWrite 127 79% 354 MB/s	4K Read 36.4 4K Write 78.7 4K Mixed 46 156% 53.7 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 190 DQ Mixed 265 202% 277 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 88.5% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 395GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 144 150 151 151 151 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	89.4% Excellent	Read 163 Write 153 Mixed 73.1 SusWrite 149 98% 135 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 89.4% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB-$299 20,912 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	60% Above average	MC Read 21 MC Write 22.2 MC Mixed 20.7 61% 21.3 GB/s	SC Read 11.1 SC Write 22.3 SC Mixed 18 49% 17.1 GB/s	Latency 78.5 51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 91%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-A Builds (Compare 1,073 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H110M-A - $76

CPU
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	314x
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	181x
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	144x

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	125x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	109x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	85x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	46x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	33x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	29x

RAM
Fury DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBHyperX $299Bench 79%, 20,912 samples	30x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBCorsair $46Bench 69%, 47,721 samples	25x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	25x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 30% - Below average

Total price: $542

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16