Asrock Z370 Gaming K6

Performance Results


Gaming 68% Battle cruiser	Desktop 108% UFO	Workstation 65% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	57.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	117% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock Z370 Gaming K6 (all builds)
Memory	26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181108
Uptime	6.4 Days
Run Date	Nov 03 '20 at 03:03
Run Duration	424 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$193 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 5.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Memory 92.4 1-Core 163 2-Core 326 105% 194 Pts	4-Core 638 8-Core 1057 103% 847 Pts	64-Core 1,342 83% 1,342 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Asus(1043 0527) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1360 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.10.1 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	57.5% Above average	Lighting 72.8 Reflection 71.4 Parallax 91.2 59% 78.5 fps	MRender 70.9 Gravity 72.4 Splatting 57.7 54% 67 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hgst HDN728080AL 8TB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 451GB free Firmware: W91X SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 105 103 104 103 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	14.6% Very poor	Read 173 Write 180 Mixed 74.9 SusWrite 103 30% 133 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 0.6 5% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 20%
Hgst HDN728080AL 8TB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 66GB free Firmware: W91X SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 126 128 134 123 129 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	15.6% Very poor	Read 160 Write 165 Mixed 73.4 SusWrite 129 30% 132 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 4.4 4K Mixed 0.7 5% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 15.6% Great: 20%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$159 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 705GB free Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2144 2124 1467 1497 1490 1486 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	345% Outstanding	Read 2,391 Write 2,176 Mixed 1,630 SusWrite 1701 443% 1,975 MB/s	4K Read 69.8 4K Write 170 4K Mixed 97 320% 112 MB/s	DQ Read 1,126 DQ Write 907 DQ Mixed 981 744% 1,005 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 345% Great: 372%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 322GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 462 471 468 463 466 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	117% Outstanding	Read 478 Write 444 Mixed 358 SusWrite 462 98% 436 MB/s	4K Read 34.7 4K Write 110 4K Mixed 47.6 172% 64.3 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 343 DQ Mixed 352 267% 360 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 124%
Crucial MX300 750GB-$99 24,471 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 147GB free Firmware: M0CR070 SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 433 361 323 327 322 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	98.4% Outstanding	Read 394 Write 439 Mixed 372 SusWrite 368 89% 393 MB/s	4K Read 24.5 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 42.1 146% 56.8 MB/s	DQ Read 351 DQ Write 314 DQ Mixed 340 253% 335 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 98.4% Great: 104%
Seagate ST10000NM0016-1T 10TB 41 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 917GB free Firmware: SND0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 196 198 194 197 194 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 13% Great: 110%
Seagate ST10000NM0016-1T 10TB 41 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 168GB free Firmware: SNE0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 116 115 114 115 116 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 13% Great: 110%
Hitachi HUH721010AL 10TB 44 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 88GB free Firmware: T21D SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 228 228 227 213 226 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	127% Outstanding	Read 216 Write 211 Mixed 129 SusWrite 225 143% 195 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 6.9 4K Mixed 0.7 326% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 127% Great: 140%
Hitachi HMS5C4040AL 4TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 3TB free Firmware: A580 SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 65 66 66 64 65 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	45.1% Average	Read 91.6 Write 94 Mixed 29.1 SusWrite 65.3 51% 70 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.5 130% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 73%
Hitachi HDN724040AL 4TB 125 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 7GB free Firmware: A5E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 70 84 80 76 73 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	41.9% Average	Read 72.9 Write 84.6 Mixed 26 SusWrite 73.2 47% 64.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 96% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 95%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 40GB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 161 162 159 162 156 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	98.3% Outstanding	Read 182 Write 194 Mixed 29.9 SusWrite 160 102% 141 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 157% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 98.3% Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 9GB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 179 174 171 165 175 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	94.8% Outstanding	Read 157 Write 143 Mixed 37.8 SusWrite 173 92% 128 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.6 159% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 94.8% Great: 107%
Hitachi HDN728080ALE604 8TB 1,150 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 278GB free Firmware: A4GNW91X SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 187 193 197 201 209 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 171 Write 184 Mixed 73.7 SusWrite 199 114% 157 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 4.4 4K Mixed 0.6 190% 2 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 110%
Hitachi HUH721212AL 12TB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 116% 2.5TB free Firmware: T3D0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 166 167 166 166 163 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 201 Write 205 Mixed 124 SusWrite 166 128% 174 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 1.3 391% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 135%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMR16GX4M2C3600C18 4x8GB 859 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	MC Read 38.2 MC Write 37.9 MC Mixed 30.1 101% 35.4 GB/s	SC Read 22.6 SC Write 48 SC Mixed 35.3 101% 35.3 GB/s	Latency 63.3 63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 123%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z370 Gaming K6 Builds (Compare 974 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 111%

UFO

Desktop 95%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 102%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z370 Gaming K6

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $193Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	562x
Core i5-8600KIntel $139Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	153x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	47x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	126x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	108x
RTX 3080Nvidia $898Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	62x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	39x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	34x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	31x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	51x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	37x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	33x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $757

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16