Samsung RV415/RV515

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 17%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemSamsung RV415/RV515  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG RV415/RV415
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 02 '20 at 23:02
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E-300 APU-$120
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Memory 32
1-Core 15.4
2-Core 26.9
17% 24.8 Pts
4-Core 27.2
8-Core 28.3
4% 27.8 Pts
64-Core 26.4
2% 26.4 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6310
Sanyo(144D C648) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.84% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 1.54
Parallax 1.25
1% 1.26 fps
MRender 1.24
Gravity 0.63
Splatting 1.35
1% 1.07 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.84%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST320LM000 HM321HI 320GB
246GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AJ10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 77 81 74 82 84 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
43.3% Average
Read 72.4
Write 72
Mixed 46.1
SusWrite 78.4
49% 67.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
87% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SH564568FH8NZPHSCR Samsung M471B5773DH0-CH9 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
MC Read 3.6
MC Write 3.2
MC Mixed 4
10% 3.6 GB/s
SC Read 2.5
SC Write 1.9
SC Mixed 3
7% 2.47 GB/s
Latency 243
16% 243 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RV415/RV515 Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 13%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung RV415/RV515

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback