Asus P8Z68-V PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8Z68-V PRO  (all builds)
Memory18.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121109
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 02 '20 at 21:58
Run Duration237 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
83% Excellent
Memory 94.1
1-Core 113
2-Core 223
82% 143 Pts
4-Core 389
8-Core 579
60% 484 Pts
64-Core 578
36% 578 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 83%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Zotac(19DA 2445) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.09
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Lighting 130
Reflection 143
Parallax 135
106% 136 fps
MRender 100
Gravity 125
Splatting 107
91% 111 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 101%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 240GB-$65
220GB free
Firmware: 60AABBF0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 305
Write 204
Mixed 198
52% 236 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 49
4K Mixed 28.2
98% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 139
DQ Mixed 148
112% 151 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 84%
WD Blue 250GB-$77
19GB free
Firmware: X41110WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 460
Write 442
Mixed 314
90% 405 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 41.3
4K Mixed 29.9
91% 30.4 MB/s
DQ Read 353
DQ Write 281
DQ Mixed 171
168% 268 MB/s
Poor: 59% Great: 100%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 480
Write 436
Mixed 406
98% 441 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 75.2
4K Mixed 42
139% 49 MB/s
DQ Read 392
DQ Write 351
DQ Mixed 295
242% 346 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 125%
Crucial BX100 250GB-$141
198GB free
Firmware: MU02
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 332
Write 227
Mixed 220
57% 259 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 50.8
4K Mixed 30.8
102% 35.1 MB/s
DQ Read 165
DQ Write 125
DQ Mixed 129
101% 140 MB/s
Poor: 59% Great: 103%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
567GB free
Firmware: CC54
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 137
Write 105
Mixed 61.6
75% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 96%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
843GB free
Firmware: CC54
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 134
Write 86.3
Mixed 63.5
70% 94.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 96%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
596GB free
Firmware: CC52
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 111
Write 90.6
Mixed 64
66% 88.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
108% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 96%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC54
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 136
Write 110
Mixed 68.2
78% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 04CD F3-12800CL10-8GBXL 859B BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 04CD F3-12800CL10-8GBXL 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
57.6% Above average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 18.1
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 19.6
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 59.6
67% 59.6 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z68-V PRO Builds (Compare 1,456 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V PRO - $390

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $985
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback