Gigabyte GA-Z170X-Gaming 7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics25% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive141% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z170X-Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory18.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170628
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 01 '20 at 22:51
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Memory 84.2
1-Core 132
2-Core 262
88% 160 Pts
4-Core 479
8-Core 698
74% 589 Pts
64-Core 737
46% 737 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Asus(1043 8581) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25% Poor
Lighting 30.6
Reflection 31.2
Parallax 28.4
25% 30.1 fps
MRender 35.9
Gravity 28.2
Splatting 29.4
25% 31.2 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 25%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket Q 1TB
256GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT30Q.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 225 160 108 66 125 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
141% Outstanding
Read 1,093
Write 846
Mixed 1,056
SusWrite 150
176% 786 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 63.6
189% 68.8 MB/s
DQ Read 746
DQ Write 500
DQ Mixed 560
435% 602 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 141%
Great: 305%
SanDisk SSD Plus 960GB-$90
201GB free
Firmware: Z33130RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 61 118 102 52 228 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Read 362
Write 128
Mixed 18.6
SusWrite 115
34% 156 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 10.5
4K Mixed 0.1
27% 8.23 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 253
DQ Mixed 9
60% 135 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 78%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB
517GB free, PID 00b9
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.52% Terrible
Read 18.9
Write 0.2
Mixed 2
SusWrite 0.2
4% 5.33 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
16% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 3.52%
Great: 13%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB
115GB free, PID 00b9
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.9 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.4% Terrible
Read 18.1
Write 0.2
Mixed 2
SusWrite 0.3
4% 5.15 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
15% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 3.4%
Great: 13%
WD My Passport 0830 2TB
206GB free, PID 0830
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 2.2 3.5 2.2 2.5 3.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
3.1% Terrible
Read 15.2
Write 4.2
Mixed 10
SusWrite 2.6
9% 8 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
11% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 3.1%
Great: 43%
WD 5000BEV External 500GB
170GB free, PID 0704
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.8 8.8 9 8.7 9 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
9.27% Terrible
Read 36.9
Write 8
Mixed 16.2
SusWrite 10.4
20% 17.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
36% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 9.27%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.3% Very good
MC Read 25.7
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 23.6
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 30.8
SC Mixed 24.8
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z170X-Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 3,663 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z170X-Gaming 7 - $191

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $781
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback