Alienware Aurora Ryzen Edition

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive222% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAlienware Aurora Ryzen Edition  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0NWN7M
Memory23.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200715
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateNov 01 '20 at 20:10
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900 12-Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Memory 79
1-Core 152
2-Core 302
95% 178 Pts
4-Core 606
8-Core 1,195
106% 900 Pts
64-Core 2,063
128% 2,063 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$271
Dell(1028 3759) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.67
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 113
Reflection 105
Parallax 115
92% 111 fps
Gravity 106
Splatting 81.1
81% 93.7 fps
Poor: 80% Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron 2200S NVMe 1024GB
463GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 22001040 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1137 1214 1242 1301 1263 1304 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
222% Outstanding
Read 1,277
Write 1,305
Mixed 1,091
SusWrite 1,244
277% 1,229 MB/s
4K Read 43.9
4K Write 84.5
4K Mixed 57.1
184% 61.8 MB/s
DQ Read 827
DQ Write 846
DQ Mixed 908
663% 860 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 222%
Great: 219%
Amd-raid TOSHIBA HDWD240 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: KQ00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 162 163 167 170 167 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 93.8
Mixed 74.7
SusWrite 164
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 7.2
4K Mixed 0.5
276% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 102%
WD My Book 25EE 12TB
4.5TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 175 175 176 179 176 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 186
Mixed 130
SusWrite 176
227% 167 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 9.3
4K Mixed 1
371% 5.3 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 5.8
DQ Mixed 1.4
246% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 103%
Samsung Flash Drive FIT 128GB
20GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 37 24 24 20 33 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 291
Write 70.2
Mixed 49.3
SusWrite 29.4
108% 110 MB/s
4K Read 13.3
4K Write 16
4K Mixed 10.8
961% 13.4 MB/s
DQ Read 18
DQ Write 2.7
DQ Mixed 12
567% 10.9 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 101%
Great: 117%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown XRMWRN-MIE 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 40.8
MC Write 35.9
MC Mixed 35.7
107% 37.5 GB/s
SC Read 23.9
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 33.5
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 82.4
48% 82.4 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 101%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aurora Ryzen Edition Builds (Compare 887 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 173%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 157%
UFO

System: Alienware Aurora Ryzen Edition

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $670
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback