HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1494
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110308
Uptime8 Days
Run DateNov 01 '20 at 14:28
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 16,811,440 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
62.6% Good
Memory 86.8
1-Core 38.5
2-Core 92.5
48% 72.6 Pts
4-Core 237
8-Core 160
28% 198 Pts
64-Core 198
12% 198 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 260-$250
Nvidia(10DE 0738) 1.8GB
Ram: 1.8GB, Driver: 341.74
Relative performance (0th percentile)
4.16% Terrible
Lighting 5.77
Reflection 4.23
Parallax 3.28
5% 4.43 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 5.63
Splatting 3
3% 3.88 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 4.16%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 160GB-$149
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4PC10365
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 140 138 141 135 135 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
39.3% Below average
Read 210
Write 151
Mixed 149
SusWrite 137
36% 162 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 26.2
4K Mixed 17
58% 19.3 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 69.7
DQ Mixed 66.8
59% 90.4 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 51%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
666GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 116 118 118 117 116 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
65.7% Good
Read 112
Write 114
Mixed 63.2
SusWrite 116
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.9% Poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 7.4
21% 7.4 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 7.3
SC Mixed 6
18% 6.17 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 1,779 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback