Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-HD3

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	52.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-HD3 (all builds)
Memory	5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151102
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 23 '17 at 11:12
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	BGR-User
Background CPU	74%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka) 31,243 User benchmarks, average bench 42% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	52.5% Above average	Memory 72.5 1-Core 64.6 2-Core 112 52% 82.9 Pts	4-Core 191 8-Core 187 25% 189 Pts	64-Core 185 12% 185 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325 82,117 User benchmarks, average bench 50% Sapphire(174B E324) CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.4.2 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	52.9% Above average	Lighting 66.3 Reflection 52 Parallax 71.2 54% 63.2 fps	MRender 55.8 Gravity 52.4 Splatting 73 51% 60.4 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team L7 EVO SSD 240GB 581 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 180GB free Firmware: V2.5 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 47 (A1) Unknown 100 100 0 (A4) Unknown 100 100 967 (A5) Unknown 100 100 2 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 1 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 48 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 92 (F2) Unknown 100 100 32 (F3) Unknown 100 100 0 (F4) Unknown 100 100 0 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 0 (FB) Unknown 100 100 0 (FC) Unknown 100 100 0 (FD) Unknown 100 100 0 (FE) Unknown 100 100 0	61% Good	Read 476 Write 366 Mixed 423 94% 422 MB/s	4K Read 16.6 4K Write 49.2 4K Mixed 2.26 54% 22.7 MB/s	DQ Read 102 DQ Write 117 DQ Mixed 3.97 32% 74.3 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 69%
Adata XPG SX900 128GB-$103 6,500 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 73GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5.0.7a Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 107 107 15461413 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 3 (09) Power-on hours count 80 80 -79182017051285 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2088 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 214 (B1) Unknown 0 0 2 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 33 48 42952818721 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 15461413 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 3 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 15461413 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 15461413 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 17942 (EA) Unknown 0 0 16611 (F1) Unknown 0 0 16611 (F2) Unknown 0 0 20212	49.9% Average	Read 470 Write 155 Mixed 221 62% 282 MB/s	4K Read 13.6 4K Write 61.4 4K Mixed 8.28 64% 27.8 MB/s	DQ Read 15.8 DQ Write 136 DQ Mixed 34.4 39% 62.2 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 82%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 2.5TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 659GB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 68 (03) Spinup time 137 137 34386674089 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1602 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 121 121 34 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3314 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 701 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1923 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1923 (C2) HDA temperature 181 181 167504379937 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 17683	97.3% Outstanding	Read 180 Write 160 Mixed 162 126% 167 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.54 4K Mixed 0.18 78% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 95% ↑ This bench: 97.3% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL11-11-11 D3 1x8GB 184 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	24.9% Poor	MC Read 9.2 MC Write 8.1 MC Mixed 7.9 24% 8.4 GB/s	SC Read 5.4 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 6.8 17% 6.03 GB/s	Latency 95.6 42% 95.6 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 24.9% Great: 32%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-F2A88XM-HD3 Builds (Compare 172 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-HD3 - $80

CPU
A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 45%, 19,875 samples	18x
A8-6600K APUAMD $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples	17x
A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples	14x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	11x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	11x
Radeon HD 8470DAMDBench 3%, 8,268 samples	8x

SSD
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	9x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	4x
SU 630 240GBAdataBench 62%, 346 samples	4x

RAM
BLS4G3D1609DS 2x4GBCrucialBench 43%, 4,102 samples	8x
GR1600D364L11 12GBUnknownBench 25%, 11 samples	6x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 41%, 7,567 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 45% - Average

Total price: $253

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16