Gigabyte GA-Z270-HD3P-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 62% Destroyer	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 50% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	76.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z270-HD3P
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z270-HD3P-CF (all builds)
Memory	11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170424
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Nov 01 '20 at 04:17
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$247 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	72.8% Very good	Memory 96.1 1-Core 93 2-Core 168 72% 119 Pts	4-Core 269 8-Core 404 42% 336 Pts	64-Core 401 25% 401 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$273 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Gigabyte(1458 3FC1) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 3675 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.09 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	76.9% Very good	Lighting 96.9 Reflection 97.2 Parallax 89.3 79% 94.5 fps	MRender 114 Gravity 86.2 Splatting 74.2 73% 91.6 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 76.9% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109 201,200 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 379GB free Firmware: RVQ02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 460 462 484 451 427 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	119% Outstanding	Read 510 Write 478 Mixed 415 SusWrite 454 104% 464 MB/s	4K Read 35.3 4K Write 108 4K Mixed 50.3 175% 64.7 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 344 DQ Mixed 360 270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 121%
Seagate ST1000DM003-1SB10C 120GB 6GB free (System drive) Firmware: 60AABBF0 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 273 Write 148 Mixed 204 157% 208 MB/s	4K Read 29.8 4K Write 89.1 4K Mixed 41.7 7,525% 53.5 MB/s	DQ Read 104 DQ Write 134 DQ Mixed 81.7 860% 107 MB/s

Kingston SHFS37A120G 1TB 36 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 494GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 169 174 172 172 167 MB/s Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive		Read 151 Write 150 Mixed 71.8 SusWrite 170 99% 136 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR4 3466 C16 2x8GB-$253 5,267 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3466 MHz Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	95.7% Outstanding	MC Read 35.5 MC Write 38.1 MC Mixed 29.5 98% 34.4 GB/s	SC Read 19.1 SC Write 34.7 SC Mixed 26.1 76% 26.6 GB/s	Latency 53.5 75% 53.5 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 95.7% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z270-HD3P-CF Builds (Compare 1,065 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 53%

Yacht

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 45%

Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270-HD3P-CF - $120

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $247Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	372x
Core i5-7600KIntel $170Bench 76%, 195,006 samples	253x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	142x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	158x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	133x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	98x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	62x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	29x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	28x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	69x
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $31Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	46x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $628

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16