Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME ALPHA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive59.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG ZENITH EXTREME ALPHA  (all builds)
Memory30 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190731
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateOct 31 '20 at 19:49
Run Duration279 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 25%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1900X-$110
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 70.6
1-Core 64.1
2-Core 169
57% 101 Pts
4-Core 396
8-Core 596
62% 496 Pts
64-Core 614
38% 614 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
Asus(1043 04FD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.10.1
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 55.2
Reflection 61.8
Parallax 78.8
45% 65.3 fps
Gravity 59.6
Splatting 53.6
50% 56.6 fps
Poor: 35% Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 7 999GB
758GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 406 433 478 432 439 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 514
Write 651
Mixed 407
SusWrite 423
112% 499 MB/s
4K Read 8.1
4K Write 8.6
4K Mixed 10.8
31% 9.17 MB/s
DQ Read 78.6
DQ Write 64.3
DQ Mixed 78.4
57% 73.8 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 282%
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB
50GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,983
Write 1,995
Mixed 2,204
531% 2,394 MB/s
4K Read 70.3
4K Write 39.4
4K Mixed 63.9
209% 57.9 MB/s
DQ Read 604
DQ Write 250
DQ Mixed 353
281% 402 MB/s
Poor: 77% Great: 123%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78
651GB free
Firmware: MK7OA840
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 92 99 104 95 94 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 82%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78
1.5TB free
Firmware: MK7OA840
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 108 111 116 108 104 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 82%
WD Re 2TB (2012)-$25
528GB free
Firmware: 01.01K01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 91 93 99 94 91 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 50% Great: 90%
WD Re 2TB-$35
288GB free
Firmware: 01.01D02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 75 79 84 78 77 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 42% Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
242GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 107 108 115 111 107 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
WD WD20EURS-63S48Y0 2TB
190GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 63 61 65 64 60 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 33% Great: 77%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$34
282GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 70 73 78 74 71 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 35% Great: 76%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
198GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 71 74 79 73 73 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 28% Great: 69%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71
780GB free
Firmware: JKAOA3MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 54 56 58 56 56 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 35% Great: 69%
Amd-raid Array 8 999GB
930GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 473 488 540 504 485 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C15D4/8G KHX2400C15D4/8G F4-3600C16-8GTZNC KHX2400C15D4/8G KHX2400C15D4/8G F4-3600C16-8GTZNC 48GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
62.4% Good
MC Read 23.1
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 21.6
63% 22 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 21.6
58% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG ZENITH EXTREME ALPHA Builds (Compare 155 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 156%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME ALPHA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,675
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback