Asus H170M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics0.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H170M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160920
Uptime1 Days
Run DateOct 31 '20 at 17:08
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 23%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Memory 89.9
1-Core 127
2-Core 237
86% 151 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 604
62% 501 Pts
64-Core 662
41% 662 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
0.14% Terrible
Lighting 0.13
Reflection 19.4
Parallax 12.5
0% 10.7 fps
MRender 0.24
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0.26
0% 0.23 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 0.14%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 280 306 261 271 297 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Read 425
Write 319
Mixed 329
SusWrite 295
77% 342 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 50.4
4K Mixed 33.1
119% 38.8 MB/s
DQ Read 364
DQ Write 88.9
DQ Mixed 165
137% 206 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 124%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$100
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 122 130 114 119 132 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Read 122
Write 106
Mixed 93.5
SusWrite 123
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 88%
WDC WD10 EZEX-00WN4A0 1TB
839GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 41 36 38 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Read 40.2
Write 39.3
Mixed 31.5
SusWrite 38.7
51% 37.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
51% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFD8213.M16FB CT8G4DFD8213.M16FB Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
74.2% Very good
MC Read 26.2
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 23.4
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 29.5
SC Mixed 24.3
68% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 67.3
59% 67.3 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H170M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,306 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H170M-PLUS - $296

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $691
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback