Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results


Gaming 74% Battleship	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 74% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	76.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME A320M-K (all builds)
Memory	27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200714
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 31 '20 at 15:54
Run Duration	184 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	89% Excellent	Memory 89.3 1-Core 125 2-Core 248 86% 154 Pts	4-Core 477 8-Core 892 82% 684 Pts	64-Core 1,316 82% 1,316 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 89% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209 230,793 User benchmarks, average bench 68% Zotac(19DA 5543) CLim: 2310 MHz, MLim: 2366 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.09 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	76.7% Very good	Lighting 98.6 Reflection 92.2 Parallax 83.8 80% 91.5 fps	MRender 85.4 Gravity 85.2 Splatting 84.3 70% 85 fps
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 76.7% Great: 73%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 4GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 6,373 Write 4,518 Mixed 5,051 1,180% 5,314 MB/s	4K Read 462 4K Write 289 4K Mixed 335 1,283% 362 MB/s	DQ Read 1,393 DQ Write 1,006 DQ Mixed 1,118 858% 1,172 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 404GB free Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 468 467 470 470 470 471 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	118% Outstanding	Read 507 Write 450 Mixed 444 SusWrite 469 105% 467 MB/s	4K Read 35.5 4K Write 89 4K Mixed 51.5 167% 58.7 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 357 DQ Mixed 294 241% 344 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 125%
Intenso External USB 3.0 1TB 1,890 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 660GB free Firmware: 1201 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 106 Write 108 Mixed 62.2 68% 92.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 74%
Intenso External USB 3.0 2TB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1.5TB free, PID 0701 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 101 101 101 101 101 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	43.1% Average	Read 102 Write 70.2 Mixed 57.2 SusWrite 99.9 108% 82.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 104% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB 54,651 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	113% Outstanding	MC Read 44 MC Write 39.8 MC Mixed 38.6 117% 40.8 GB/s	SC Read 28.8 SC Write 43.1 SC Mixed 33.5 100% 35.1 GB/s	Latency 68.2 59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 118%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,190 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $66

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $140Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	1,473x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	1,316x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	1,014x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	962x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	747x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	660x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	723x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	345x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $55Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	286x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	296x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	230x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	205x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 101% - Outstanding

Total price: $332

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060 $291	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369