MSI B85-G43 (MS-7816)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics72.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive68.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7816
MotherboardMSI B85-G43 (MS-7816)  (all builds)
Memory21.6 GB free of 28 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display5760 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131127
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateOct 31 '20 at 12:10
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Memory 88.7
1-Core 113
2-Core 218
80% 140 Pts
4-Core 428
8-Core 597
65% 512 Pts
64-Core 565
35% 565 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Lighting 96.7
Reflection 85.8
Parallax 74.3
79% 85.6 fps
MRender 68.9
Gravity 79
Splatting 73.9
61% 73.9 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 541ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 88 84 97 97 94 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
68.3% Good
Read 396
Write 129
Mixed 177
SusWrite 94
44% 199 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 90.4
4K Mixed 32.5
136% 51.1 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 96.1
DQ Mixed 132
96% 127 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 73%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
8GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 261
Write 240
Mixed 211
53% 238 MB/s
4K Read 40.4
4K Write 79.8
4K Mixed 48.1
165% 56.1 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 146
122% 176 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
Maxtor STM3160813AS 160GB
17GB free
Firmware: MC1H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 91 87 84 80 82 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
48% Average
Read 81.2
Write 81.7
Mixed 45.3
SusWrite 85.9
54% 73.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 48%
Great: 66%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
54GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 140 138 139 141 140 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
79.8% Very good
Read 138
Write 113
Mixed 77.2
SusWrite 140
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.9
189% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
10GB free
Firmware: HP74
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 72 72 72 67 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Read 66.3
Write 71.7
Mixed 50.7
SusWrite 70.1
48% 64.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
111% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 88%
Jmicron Tech 1TB
89GB free
Firmware: 0203
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.5 1.4 3.1 3.9 3.5 4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Write 10.5
Mixed 8.7
SusWrite 2.9
6% 7.37 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
57% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 76%
Hitachi HTS547575A9E384 750GB
73GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 36 36 36 35 36 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Read 32.7
Write 34.5
Mixed 30.3
SusWrite 35.2
46% 33.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
56% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-1600C11-8GIS Kingston 99U5471-040.A00LF 0420 F3-1600C11-8GIS 1315 CT51264BA160BJ.C8F 28GB
1600, 1333, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.2% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 13.4
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 12.2
34% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B85-G43 (MS-7816) Builds (Compare 891 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI B85-G43 (MS-7816) - $90

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $537
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback