Lenovo 30B5001CMT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics115% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 30B5001CMT  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 102F
Memory23 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170504
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 31 '20 at 02:06
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 39%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
LGA2011-3 SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Memory 82.2
1-Core 118
2-Core 222
79% 141 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 654
64% 527 Pts
64-Core 746
46% 746 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
MSI(1462 3722) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.09
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
115% Outstanding
Lighting 163
Reflection 158
Parallax 172
133% 164 fps
MRender 152
Gravity 110
Splatting 89.1
92% 117 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 115%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN512 512GB
226GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2L0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 289 292 290 284 285 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 446
Write 422
Mixed 379
SusWrite 310
88% 389 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 76.8
4K Mixed 49.7
156% 53.5 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 350
264% 353 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 102%
Great: 111%
WD Purple 4TB (2014)-$71
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 133 132 134 135 136 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 125
Write 132
Mixed 69.1
SusWrite 134
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 100%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 479GB
225GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 435 436 434 433 432 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 10% Great: 103%
FLASH Drive CBM_USB20 2GB
2GB free, PID 2093
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 3.5 3.6 3.5 3.5 3.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
6.01% Terrible
Read 22.7
Write 3.2
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 3.5
8% 8.48 MB/s
4K Read 8.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
31% 2.77 MB/s
Kingston DT 100 G2 16GB
10GB free, PID 1653
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 9.6 8.9 8.6 8.8 12 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
6.94% Terrible
Read 18
Write 7.7
Mixed 18.2
SusWrite 10.1
18% 13.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 1.4
75% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.94%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A1G43EB1-CRC M393A1G43EB1-CRC Hynix HMA42GR7AFR4N-UH 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
71.3% Very good
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 25.7
MC Mixed 24.9
75% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 17.6
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 30B5001CMT Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

System: Lenovo 30B5001CMT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 25% - Poor Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback