MSI MPG X570 GAMING PRO CARBON WIFI (MS-7B93)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 166%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 180%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics173% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive319% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B93
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING PRO CARBON WIFI (MS-7B93)  (all builds)
Memory57.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 30 '20 at 19:38
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Memory 84.1
1-Core 147
2-Core 291
94% 174 Pts
4-Core 580
8-Core 1,001
96% 790 Pts
64-Core 1999
124% 1999 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$700
Nvidia(10DE 1467) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 457.09
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
173% Outstanding
Lighting 250
Reflection 236
Parallax 258
204% 248 fps
MRender 282
Gravity 222
Splatting 135
166% 213 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 173%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$159
508GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1222 1154 1151 1160 1134 1092 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
319% Outstanding
Read 2,518
Write 2,390
Mixed 1,739
SusWrite 1,152
437% 1,950 MB/s
4K Read 64.3
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 89.9
301% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 1,309
DQ Write 1,120
DQ Mixed 1,210
908% 1,213 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 319%
Great: 372%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$92
761GB free
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2079 1701 1708 1721 1716 1723 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
327% Outstanding
Read 1,952
Write 2,203
Mixed 1,842
SusWrite 1,775
439% 1,943 MB/s
4K Read 50.4
4K Write 174
4K Mixed 76.3
266% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 1,412
DQ Write 1,233
DQ Mixed 1,326
993% 1,324 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 327%
Great: 347%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3600C18-16GTZN F4-3600C16-16GTZNC F4-3600C18-16GTZN F4-3600C16-16GTZNC 64GB
3600, 3600, 3600, 3600 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 45.2
MC Write 38.5
MC Mixed 39.7
118% 41.1 GB/s
SC Read 22.3
SC Write 24.7
SC Mixed 35
78% 27.3 GB/s
Latency 73.3
55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 110%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG X570 GAMING PRO CARBON WIFI (MS-7B93) Builds (Compare 4,573 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 161%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 162%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PRO CARBON WIFI (MS-7B93)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $980
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback