| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 33.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 16.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asus M5A97 R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 14.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20150626 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 29 '20 at 19:18 |
| Run Duration | 107 Seconds |
| Run User | MEX-User |
| Background CPU | 1% |
PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
67.1%
Good
|
64% 103 Pts
|
32% 251 Pts
|
18% 286 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R9 280-$185
Asus(1043 047E) 3GB
CLim: 980 MHz, MLim: 1300 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 20.8.2
|
33.7%
Below average
|
36% 42.6 fps
|
30% 36.2 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adata SP600 64GB
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.21
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 38 42 37 34 MB/s
|
16.3%
Very poor
|
12% 55.5 MB/s
|
37% 8.43 MB/s
| |
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,841 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 875x |
| FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 649x |
| FX-8320AMD $125Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 442x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 187x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 161x |
| RX 480AMD $75Bench 46%, 261,163 samples | 122x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 71% - Very good | Total price: $354 |